- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 19:53:30 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1358 ------- Additional Comments From fsasaki@w3.org 2005-05-18 19:53 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I think the binding of URIs to actual collations is something that's best left > to configuration parameters, APIs, and the like - in other words, it's outside > the scope of the language. > > One thing we might consider, though, is to encourage implementors to provide > configuration mechanisms that allow users to choose their own URIs to refer to > collations, rather than only providing a fixed set of vendor-supplied URIs. If > implementors do this, it will greatly improve interoperability. > > Michael Kay (personal response) Suppose a user who wants to make a linguistic analysis of texts, and variation in collations - e.g. due to historic differences - is a crucial part of the analysis. Of course this is an unusal case, but my point is that such a user would not like to change the API or a parameter. The collation would be part of the query / analysis.
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2005 19:57:02 UTC