http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1414 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.robie@datadirect.com 2005-05-18 13:51 ------- > I think it is easier to understand if order-by has a slightly > different type semantics than lt,<. So I advocate to have clean > order-by semantics and still align value and general comparison > operators. I assume you are saying that we would introduce a different operator, a transitive one, for order by, to replace the operators that you propose to make non-transitive? I would have to see a concrete proposal before I can comment technically, but I am concerned that we already have too many ways of comparing items in XQuery, and I'm reluctant to add one more.Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2005 13:55:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:05 UTC