- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 18:46:49 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1368 ------- Additional Comments From jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2005-05-11 18:46 ------- Yup, keyword operators like 'union' were what I had in mind when I said "(Yes, the problem is more general than that, but this note is only talking about the '*' case.)" In my alternate wording in Bug 1390, I cover both "*" and keywords. Mind you, I missed the ambiguity, which is a stronger argument. I'll go tack on an amendment.
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2005 18:46:52 UTC