- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:32:28 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1379
Summary: [XQuery] some editorial comments on A.1.1 grammar-note:
comments
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XQuery
AssignedTo: chamberl@almaden.ibm.com
ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
A.1.1 grammar-note: comments
"Expression comments"
Change to "Comments".
"are allowed inside expressions"
And elsewhere.
"Note that expression comments"
Change "expression comments" to "comments".
"are not allowed in constructor content"
Insert "direct" before "constructor" ?
Actually, they *are* allowed in constructor content, given a suitable
definition of "in":
<a> { "foo" (:comment:) } </a>
"Comments can nest within each other,"
"within each other" suggests 'A within B, and B within A.' Change to just
"Comments can nest" or "A comment can contain nested comments".
"as long as all "(:" and ":)" patterns are balanced, no matter where they occur
within the outer comment."
Well, that's basically what it means for comments to nest.
Change sentence to:
A comment can contain nested comments. This means that occurrences of
"(:" and ":)" in the body of the comment must be balanced.
"will parse correctly"
Leave the parser out of it. Change to "is syntactically legal".
"ignoring the comment"
A dangling participle, I think.
"<eg (: an example:)> $i//title </eg>"
Maybe you intended to put $i//title within braces.
"but characters inside the element is element content"
Change "is" to "are".
Maybe change phrase to "but the characters that look like a comment are in
fact literal element content".
"and not an expression comment"
Change "expression comment" to "comment".
"See Comments, Pragmas and Extensions for further information and examples."
The name of that section is now just "Comments".
It's silly to split information and examples between here and A.2.3. Please
merge them.
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2005 07:32:31 UTC