- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 15:27:36 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1308 ------- Additional Comments From mike@saxonica.com 2005-05-06 15:27 ------- Thanks for the suggestion, the WG will look at it. It's a cosmetic change, but personally I'm reasonably sympathetic to it. xsl:perform-sort is proving to be one of the less-frequently-used features of 2.0, and perhaps if it's combined with xsl:sequence more people will notice its existence. Michael Kay (personal response)
Received on Friday, 6 May 2005 15:27:42 UTC