- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 14:09:35 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1308
Summary: proposal: merge xsl:perform-sort and xsl:sequence
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSLT 2.0
AssignedTo: mike@saxonica.com
ReportedBy: davidc@nag.co.uk
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
As far as I can tell, an xsl:perform-sort is identical in all respects to
xsl:sequence except that in perform-sort (at least one) xsl:sort is mandatory
and in xsl:sequence xsl:sort is not allowed.
I would propose to remove xsl:perform-sort from the specification and allow
xsl:sort as a child of xsl:sequence (so that the semantics of xsl:sequence
become those currently used for xsl:perform-sort if it has an xsl:sort child)
This simplifies the specification (one less element) and makes the use of
xsl:sort more consistent. In other cases xsl:sort is optionally allowed as a
child of the containing instruction (eg xsl:for-each) with sorting occurring if
it is present, it is only in this case that there are two separate instructions,
one requiring a sort specification and the other not allowing it.
David
Received on Friday, 6 May 2005 14:09:53 UTC