- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 10:16:25 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1287
Summary: pitest
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XQueryX
AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org
ReportedBy: davidc@nag.co.uk
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
The stylesheet has
<xsl:text>processing-instruction</xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select="$LPAREN"/>
<xsl:value-of select="*"/>
<xsl:value-of select="$RPAREN"/>
</xsl:template>
value-of select="*" will (in xslt1) silently discard all but the first node.
this looks a bit dangereous, but actually I wonder why the schema allows more
than one node here.
The Xquery grammar has
[89 (Core)] PITest ::=
<"processing-instruction" "("> (NCName | StringLiteral)? ")"
so 0-or-1 node that is NCName-or-String
However the XqueryX schema has
<xsd:element name="piTest">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:choice minOccurs="0">
<xsd:element name="piTarget" type="xsd:NCName"/>
<xsd:element name="piValue" type="xsd:string"/>
</xsd:choice>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
so any number of "pitargets" and "pivalues". Shouldn't the schema be brought int
o line with the grammar, or, since the string version is explictly only there
for XPath1 compatibility, and equivalent to the use of an NCName, the XQueryX
version only really needs to model the child of pitest being 0-or-1 NCName.
David
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 10:16:36 UTC