- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:25:56 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1502 ------- Additional Comments From mike@saxonica.com 2005-06-16 18:25 ------- I'm inclined to agree. Experience of using this function suggests it's very hard to remember which way to set the boolean argument, and the resulting code is not clear to the reader. I think we were over-influenced by pressure to minimize the number of functions. Perhaps suitable names might be escape-uri() and escape-uri-part(). I haven't seen use cases for an unescape-uri() function, but I agree there's an argument for it based on completeness. Michael Kay (personal response)
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 18:25:59 UTC