- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 03:25:56 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1375 ------- Additional Comments From scott_boag@us.ibm.com 2005-07-09 03:25 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > A.1.1 Grammar Notes (general) > > "Note" > A.1 EBNF says that production comments are normative, but 1 Introduction > says that material labeled as "Note" is not normative. I think that was talking about a formal Note, but in any case, as noted in my previous comment, I've added the additional "extra-grammatical constraint" and made specific that gn: notes are not normative, and enclosed the grammar-notes proper in a Notes section (part of the W3C xml-spec). > (examples) > From A.1.1 to A.2.3, could the examples be put in > <div class="exampleInner"> > The <code> font is 'monospace', and the <body> font is 'sans-serif', which > aren't that easy to distinguish when run together inline. I can't just edit the HTML, since this is going through xml-spec. I played with some options, but it's just not worth it to spend a lot of time on it.
Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 03:26:00 UTC