[Bug 1375] [XQuery] some editorial comments on A.1.1 Grammar Notes (general)

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1375





------- Additional Comments From scott_boag@us.ibm.com  2005-07-09 03:07 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> (Speaking for myself) I think the point about the word "note"
> is well taken.  Perhaps we should replace the term "grammar-note"
> with "extra-grammatical constraint", abbreviated EGC or something
> in the comments in the grammar, for the items that affect the
> language recognized.

I've used the xgc: and  "extra-grammatical constraint" for leading-lone-slash,
xml-version, reserved-function-names, and occurrence-indicators.  The others
remain gc: or ws:.

Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 03:08:03 UTC