RE: [XSLT2.0] named "templates"

I think the terminology in the spec now matches popular and natural usage: a
template has a one-to-one correspondence with an xsl:template element. In
1.0, the content of an xsl:if instruction was technically a template, but
no-one ever called it that.
 
Michael Kay


  _____  

From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of DuCharme, Bob
(LNG-CHO)
Sent: 19 January 2005 18:20
To: 'public-qt-comments@w3.org'
Subject: [XSLT2.0] named "templates"


If "The term sequence constructor replaces template as used in XSLT 1.0"
[1], then the terminology used to define named templates[2] needs some
reworking, or at least some additional explanation, to fit in better with
the terminology of the new data model. (Named what?) 
 
Bob DuCharme
 
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xslt20-20041105/#dt-sequence-constructor
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xslt20-20041105/#named-templates