W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > January 2005

RE: [XSLT2.0] named "templates"

From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:05:30 -0000
To: "'DuCharme, Bob \(LNG-CHO\)'" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E1CrN1k-0008HA-RQ@frink.w3.org>
I think the terminology in the spec now matches popular and natural usage: a
template has a one-to-one correspondence with an xsl:template element. In
1.0, the content of an xsl:if instruction was technically a template, but
no-one ever called it that.
Michael Kay


From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of DuCharme, Bob
Sent: 19 January 2005 18:20
To: 'public-qt-comments@w3.org'
Subject: [XSLT2.0] named "templates"

If "The term sequence constructor replaces template as used in XSLT 1.0"
[1], then the terminology used to define named templates[2] needs some
reworking, or at least some additional explanation, to fit in better with
the terminology of the new data model. (Named what?) 
Bob DuCharme
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xslt20-20041105/#dt-sequence-constructor
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xslt20-20041105/#named-templates
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:06:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:03 UTC