- From: DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:44:01 -0500
- To: "'public-qt-comments@w3.org'" <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:45:09 UTC
Never mind, I now see that " An <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xslt20-20041105/#element-template> xsl:template declaration defines a template, which contains a sequence <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xslt20-20041105/#dt-sequence-constructor> constructor." I didn't realize that "as used in XSLT 1.0" qualifies that sentence to indicate that the word "template" isn't being completely replaced. Bob _____ From: DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 1:20 PM To: 'public-qt-comments@w3.org' Subject: [XSLT2.0] named "templates" If "The term sequence constructor replaces template as used in XSLT 1.0" [1], then the terminology used to define named templates[2] needs some reworking, or at least some additional explanation, to fit in better with the terminology of the new data model. (Named what?) Bob DuCharme [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xslt20-20041105/#dt-sequence-constructor <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xslt20-20041105/#dt-sequence-constructor> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xslt20-20041105/#named-templates <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xslt20-20041105/#named-templates>
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:45:09 UTC