[Bug 2456] Changes to min() and max()

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2456





------- Additional Comments From mrys@microsoft.com  2005-12-13 16:03 -------
I spoke with our developers and they think the status quo is the best way to 
use existing language aggregators since they normally get invoked after 
atomization and type promotion. With the proposed change, you would have to 
either preserve both values in that case and their relationship which would 
make the aggregators very costly to use or write a completely new aggregator 
which is not a good idea either.

Therefore, we think that the changes done in 1512 should stay.

Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 16:03:51 UTC