- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:03:29 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2456 ------- Additional Comments From mrys@microsoft.com 2005-12-13 16:03 ------- I spoke with our developers and they think the status quo is the best way to use existing language aggregators since they normally get invoked after atomization and type promotion. With the proposed change, you would have to either preserve both values in that case and their relationship which would make the aggregators very costly to use or write a completely new aggregator which is not a good idea either. Therefore, we think that the changes done in 1512 should stay.
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 16:03:51 UTC