- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:57:38 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1233 ac@hyperbase.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | ------- Additional Comments From ac@hyperbase.com 2005-04-28 19:57 ------- The proposition is not meant to replace the individual override serialization parameters but to allow more efficient use of preset output formats, the two approaches being complementary. The current solution limits the use of presets and forces a recourse to many individual parameters and the corresponding application variables. The only required change is that the output format name should be a computable string instead of a literal QName. The example provided compares 3 approaches to a common problem showing some of the differences. We agree that individual override parameters are very useful but selecting what they can override and using output presets is also very useful, as well as in-line with the language spirit and constructs, and all that is required is to reduce some restrictions on the result-document format attribute, also making it similar to most other parameters. Thank you. ac.
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:57:47 UTC