- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:15:43 -0800
- To: "Per Bothner" <per@bothner.com>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
I happen to think that schema should not necessarily add these types by changing their name. But then that is a schema WG coordination issue.... Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: Per Bothner [mailto:per@bothner.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 12:00 PM > To: Michael Rys > Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: [RESPONSE qt-2004Feb0384-01] [General] Please use less > namespaces > > Michael Rys wrote: > > Sharing the namespace will lead to confusion. For example, I can refer > > to xs:anySimpleType inside a schema but I cannot refer to > > xs:anyAtomicType. Keeping them in separate namespaces makes it clear > > that they are treated differently in different contexts. > > There is confusion either way. Currently, people have to remember and > understand which types as in xs and which in xdt. > > Also, what happens when/if dayTimeDuration get added to XML Schema. > Will we have both xdt:dayTimeDuration and xs:dayTimeDuration? Given > XQuery's "name-based" type-system, would there be a problem with two > types with the same name? > -- > --Per Bothner > per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2004 20:16:20 UTC