- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:43:50 +0100
- To: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
On Tue 2004-11-23 Michael Kay wrote:
> I haven't had a chance to study the detailed use case, but just a
> procedural observation. There comes a time when, if you want to
> finish a project, you have to say "no new functionality". We think
> we have passed that point. We're in the phase now where we are
> trying to eliminate errors, inconsistencies, and bugs, and requests
> for new functionality are getting an automatic response of "not in
> 2.0".
If that's the case, and if that decision is in effect for the
respective WG(s), then I sure respect it (I know I'm late).
Please consider the addition of the feature to the next version of the
spec.
Tobi
--
to
bi
as
re
if
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 16:43:47 UTC