- From: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:49:10 -0800
- To: duerst@w3.org
- CC: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Dear members of the I18N working group In your last call comment filed under http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/xsl-query-specs/last-call-comments/xquery/issues.xml#qt-2004Feb0415-16 you asked for <cite> [16] section 4: As shown in the examples in 2.6.6 and 2.6.7, XQuery can directly produce XML output. For such cases, it is very important to make sure that the relevant parameters for serialization (in particular encoding, but also normalization) can be defined in an XQuery prolog. There should also be clear requirements on minimal support for encodings (e.g. UTF-8 and UTF-16) to guarantee interoperability. </cite> After careful consideration, the XQuery WG decided that no such addition to the prolog can be mandated, since it is implementation-defined whether XQuery provides a serialization interface. For example, an implementation may provide the results as a SAX event stream or DOM nodes only. In that case the serialization is left to an outside component and any such parameter would not have any impact. Therefore we decided to close your comment with no action. Please let us know, if you agree with this resolution. - Stephen Buxton, on behalf of the XQuery WG
Received on Saturday, 13 November 2004 00:49:52 UTC