RE: Is xdt:anyAtomicType itself atomic?

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Ashok Malhotra wrote:

> Paul, you said ...
> > numeric = xs:integer | xs:float | xs:double
> 
> Shoudn't that be  
> numeric = xs:integer | xs:decimal | xs:float | xs:double

	No.  (My version was off the top of my head.)  It really is:

		numeric = xs:decimal | xs:float | xs:double

	Since integer <= decimal, there's no need to include integer.

	- Paul

Received on Thursday, 11 November 2004 17:42:02 UTC