- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:05:43 -0800
- To: "Paul J. Lucas" <plucas@bea.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Xdt:anyAtomicType is the abstract atomic type and thus should be considered atomic in a general case (function signatures and implied atomization), but is special (no cast) since it is abstract. Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul J. Lucas > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 3:32 PM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: Is xdt:anyAtomicType itself atomic? > > > My understanding is that xdt:anyAtomicType type is defined as > the union of all atomic types and that atomic types are only > those such as xs:integer, xs:string, etc. > > It would therefore seem to be the case that xdt:anyAtomicType > itself is not "atomic." > > This makes perfect sense to me, but it is correct? Or should > xdt:anyAtomicType itslef also be considered atomic? > > - Paul >
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 01:06:28 UTC