- From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:12:23 -0800 (PST)
- To: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Hi Mike, Thank you very much for a lucid explanation. I am completely convinced by your views. Regards, Mukul --- Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk> wrote: > > > 3) In Section 2.5 "Sequences" its mentioned, "If > > sequences are combined, the result is always a > > flattened sequence. In other words, appending (d > e) to > > (a b c) produces a sequence of length 5: (a b c d > e). > > It does not produces a sequence of length 4: > > (a b c (d e)), such a nested sequence never > occurs" > > > > I would have wished nested sequences! I am curious > to > > know, why nested sequences are not allowed in the > > language ? > > This came up as a detailed proposal during the last > call stage, and I think > the proposal failed to win support at that stage for > three main reasons: (a) > because it was too disruptive (we all want to get > finished), (b) because the > facility was felt to be unnecessary feature creep, > and (c) because nested > sequences don't seem to correspond to anything that > exists in XML. > > The data model supports sequences of nodes because > they arise naturally in > XML and are useful as the result of a query. It > supports sequences of atomic > values because they correspond to XML Schema list > types, and because they > are useful as intermediate results when doing > aggregations (e.g. sum(), > max(), min()). It supports sequences that mix atomic > values and nodes > because on balance it is better to allow them than > to impose a restriction - > they are handy in constructs such as max((@a, 0)). > But nested sequences > don't arise naturally in XML, in fact they provide a > data structure that > competes directly with XML trees. It would give you > two different kinds of > tree structure in the data model, with different > constraints and different > operators, which I think would be very confusing to > users. It's already > confusing enough to many people that you can't > access nodes in a sequence > using the sibling axis. (It wouldn't make sense, > because a node can be a > member of any number of different sequences, but it > can only belong to one > XML tree.) > > Michael Kay > (speaking for himself) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 16:12:55 UTC