- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 18:33:07 -0700
- To: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashokmalhotra@alum.mit.edu>, "Don Chamberlin" <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
This is satisfactory. Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashokmalhotra@alum.mit.edu] > Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 1:44 PM > To: Don Chamberlin; Michael Rys > Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: Casting/constructors should accept the empty sequence > > Don, Michael: > We discussed your comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt- > comments/2004Mar/0211.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- > qt-comments/2004Mar/00891.html > in San Jose and agreed to make the following changes: > > 1. The constructor functions should accept the empty sequence. If the > empty sequence is passed to a constructor function, the empty sequence is > returned. > > 2. The cast syntax allows the type name to specify whether an empty > sequence is acceptable. If it is, and the expression to be cast is the > empty sequence, the empty sequence is returned. If the empty sequence is > not allowed and the expression to be cast is the empty sequence, a type > error is raised. > > Please confirm that this is satisfactory. > > All the best, Ashok
Received on Saturday, 29 May 2004 21:33:26 UTC