- From: Matthew Fuchs <matt@westbridgetech.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:16:01 -0800
- To: "'Michael Kay'" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002801c4086e$da134fe0$7364020a@westbridgetech.com>
Michael,
Thank you for responding to quickly. I am please as punch that this is
possible.
The logic behind using "as", though, is completely opaque to me.
Matthew
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kay [mailto:mhk@mhk.me.uk]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 11:58 AM
To: 'Matthew Fuchs'; public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: RE: Returning source document nodes
_____
From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Fuchs
Sent: 12 March 2004 19:08
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: Returning source document nodes
I'm trying to understand if it is possible to use <xsl:sequence> to
return nodes, specifically elements, from the source document.
Yes, it is possible.
Without getting into the use case behind this, I read both the latest
public working draft and the current working draft as saying that in the
following:
<xsl:variable name="foo" select="somepath"/>
and
<xsl:variable name="foo">
<xsl:sequence select="somepath"/>
</xsl:variable>
$foo will be assigned equivalent nodes from the source document (in
particular, if the result is some descendant of the root, then I can
apply parent or ancestor axes and get the same results).
No: the latter case constructs a temporary tree. To return a value from
the source document, you need an "as" attribute, thus:
<xsl:variable name="foo" as="element()*">
<xsl:sequence select="somepath"/>
</xsl:variable>
If that's the case, is it further the case (here's the real
interesting part) that I can put the <xsl:sequence> in a template, i.e.,
<xsl:variable name="foo">
<xsl:apply-templates select="." mode="test"/>
</xsl:variable>
<xsl:template match=".element." mode="test">
<xsl:sequence select="somepath"/>
</xsl:template>
and, once again, get back an equivalent node?
Yes, you can do this. Again, you need the "as" attribute on
xsl:variable.
Michael Kay
(I'm not proposing to treat this enquiry as a formal comment on the
specification unless you ask me to do so.)
Thank you,
Matthew Fuchs
Received on Friday, 12 March 2004 15:16:19 UTC