RE: [XSLT2.0] IBM-XSLT-119: Obligations for unparsed-text function

I have classified this comment as editorial, and I have replaced the two
occurrences of the word "obliged" in the specification with the word
"required", using RFC2119 markup.

Please confirm that this resolution is OK.

Regards,

Michael Kay
(as XSL WG editor)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry Zongaro
> Sent: 19 February 2004 16:53
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: [XSLT2.0] IBM-XSLT-119: Obligations for 
> unparsed-text function
> 
> 
> 
> [With apologies that these comments are coming in after the 
> end of the 
> Last Call comment period.]
> 
> Section 16.2
> 
> In the paragraph following the first note, the phrase "The 
> only values 
> which every implementation is obliged to recognize" appears.  
> The words 
> "is obliged to" should be replaced with "MUST".
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Henry
> [Speaking on behalf of reviewers from IBM.]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Henry Zongaro      Xalan development
> IBM SWS Toronto Lab   T/L 969-6044;  Phone +1 905 413-6044
> mailto:zongaro@ca.ibm.com
>

Received on Friday, 20 February 2004 12:20:47 UTC