- From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:11:31 -0000
- To: "'XML Query'" <xmlquery@us.ibm.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2004 05:11:25 UTC
I think the view of the XSL working group was that we should leave it to the implementor to decide which versions of XML to support. It would be commercial suicide for a vendor not to support XML 1.0 in a 2004 product, but by 2010 the situation may look different, and we want our spec to be durable. Michael Kay -----Original Message----- From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of XML Query Sent: 03 February 2004 00:16 To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: [Serialization] IBM-SE-012: Version parameter Serialization Section 4.1, "XML Output Method: the version Parameter": This section contains the words "If the processor does not support this version of XML ...". This seems to imply that support for XML versions is an optional feature. We should clearly specify the requirements in this area. Possibly support for XML 1.0 is required and support for XML 1.1 is an optional feature that should be included on our optional feature list? --Don Chamberlin
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2004 05:11:25 UTC