- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:47:13 -0800
- To: Sarah Wilkin <swilkin@apple.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Sarah: As you correctly point out, F&O uses IEEE 754 arithmetic which is at variance with XML Schema is two ways: XML Schema says that NaN equals itself and defines only a single zero. These will be corrected in XML Schema 1.1. If the WGs agree, we could amplify the note in 6.1 a bit to make this clearer. For example: This specification uses IEEE-754 arithmetic for xs:float and xs:double values. This differs from [XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition] which defines NaN as being equal to itself and defines only a single zero. [IEEE 754-1985] arithmetic, however, treats NaN as unequal to all other values including itself and can produce distinct results of positive zero and negative zero. (These are two different machine representations for the same [XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition] value.) The text accompanying several functions discusses behaviour for both positive and negative zero inputs and outputs in the interest of alignment with [IEEE 754-1985]. All the best, Ashok > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sarah Wilkin > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:07 AM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: [F&O] 6.3 NaN difference between XQuery and XMLSchema > > > In section 6.3: > "NaN does not equal itself " > > But in the XMLSchema 3.2.5: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#double > "NaN equals itself but is .incomparable. with (neither > greater than nor less than) any other value in the .value space.. " > > I believe this discrepancy exists because most floating point > operations in XQuery use the IEEE 754 standard. If this is > the case, a note similar to others referencing IEEE 754 > should be added. > Alternatively, a consolidated section describing when to use > IEEE 754 for operations/comparisons on xs:float and xs:double > could be added to 6.1. > > --Sarah > > >
Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 01:47:57 UTC