- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 05:55:51 -0700
- To: "Stephen Buxton" <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2003 08:58:56 UTC
Thank you for your comment. This issue has been folded into FO-LC1-0060 which addresses a number of questions on the semantics of aggregate functions. All the best, Ashok ________________________________ From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Buxton Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 6:13 PM To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: ORA-FO-MAXMIN-TYPE-CONSISTENCY 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min Functions and Operators, Section 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min The type conversion rules for fn:max, fn:min are inconsistent with the type conversion rules for fn:avg. eg fn:avg says "If all values in $srcval are of type xdt:untypedAtomic they are converted to xs:double". while fn:min says "If all values in $srcval are of type xdt:untypedAtomic they are converted to xs:string".
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2003 08:58:56 UTC