- From: Todd A. Mancini <todd.mancini@daxat.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:33:43 -0400
- To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
I agree that this has always been somewhat of a mystery to me. As an implementer, the built-in functions require me to code support for overloaded functions. Indeed, I have to do EXTRA work in my function calling mechanism/compiler to NOT allow overloaded user-defined functions! -Todd -----Original Message----- From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Xavier C. Franc Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 2:30 PM To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: Re: Overloading functions in XSLT and XQuery > Currently XSLT allows user function with same name but different > number of parameters (arity), but XQuery doesn't. > Why such difference? This feature might be as useful in XQuery as in XSLT. I don't see any reason for such a difference. After all, some predefined functions and operators are overloaded, so why not user functions ? -- Xavier FRANC
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2003 14:33:44 UTC