- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:06:47 -0500
- To: Ray Whitmer <raydwhitmer@aol.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ Ray Whitmer <raydwhitmer@aol.com> was heard to say:
| <h2>DOM8</h2>
| The DOM API has used a nodeName accessor since level 1 which was
| further refined as namespace support was incorporated in level 2.
| The XPDM2 specification seems to have a dm:node-name accessor which
| behaves quite differently from the DOM accessor. We believe that
| either the value / behavior should match, or a different name should be
| used to avoid conflict and confusion.<br>
Accessors in the data model are abstract, they are not intended to be exposed
directly in APIs. APIs will use the operators and functions defined in the F&O
document. Therefore no conflict exists.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE/skyHOyltUcwYWjsRAtkSAJ998nS+shuPmKRTnm8oqtGbRHmiKQCgokK1
5IL2ZjY8q6iJhlSqUWxugC8=
=ydwi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 20:19:40 UTC