Re: DOM WG comments on XQuery 1.0 XPath 2.0 Data Model

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Ray Whitmer <raydwhitmer@aol.com> was heard to say:
| The DOM Working Group appreciates the attention given to the DOM
| concerns communicated previously.&nbsp; The refactoring of that
| specification to not rely on functional-looking constructors has done a
| lot to make the specification easier for us to understand and integrate
| with DOM concepts.&nbsp; At the previous DOM F2F meeting, I was asked
| to express a number of remaining issues.&nbsp; I will refer to XQuery
| 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model as XPDM2.<br>
| <h2>DOM1</h2>
| The DOM WG appreciates the value of the infoset mapping of the model
| and the work involved in refining it.&nbsp; The DOM WG still finds it
| unfortunate that the XPDM2 cannot rely primarily on an infoset mapping
| (See original issue 1a Different Data Models in W3C).&nbsp; Issues be
| avoided, and there could be other mismatches we have missed in our
| reading of your latest revision.<br>

These sections have been removed from the 12 Nov draft.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE/skwiOyltUcwYWjsRAnKjAJ0bXdOQeKd7licUDKLlJhPtzWBMRACfbSGy
9RAhyEzDOuUctv5PnfejxOU=
=T/4p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 20:19:34 UTC