Re: ORA-DM-PARENT-ACCESSOR 4.1 Accessors

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com> was heard to say:
| *Data Model, Section 4.1 Accessors*
|
| Suggestion: add a dm:owner accessor, defined for attributes and
| namespace nodes.
|
| This allows dm:parent and dm:children to symmetrical.
|
| See also
| http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jun/0263.html
| See also *
| *http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jun/0384.html

As mentioned in the response to DM-LC1-0098[1], the WGs feel that the
current use of a parent accessor is consistent and acceptable.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/2003/05/xpath-datamodel-issues/#DM-LC1-0098

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD4DBQE/sktUOyltUcwYWjsRAphgAJIC+lSPlb9o6R/Hz+BUU3wU0Tu0AKCTFLou
1U84Es29j2xfTJejBKt04A==
=P4eg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 20:19:29 UTC