Re: ORA-DM-FRAGMENT-TREE Appendix A, XML Information Set Conformance

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com> was heard to say:
| *Data Model, Section Appendix A, XML Information Set Conformance*
|
| First para, second sentence uses the undefined term "data model
| fragment". The term "fragment" is defined. However, "fragment" is
| defined to exclude XML documents, and I believe that the material in
| this list is intended to apply to XML documents as well as fragments.
| The encompassing term appears to be "tree". See section 4 "Nodes"
| second para.
|
| (If we do away with the term "fragment" as suggested in
| http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jun/0287.html
| presumably it will be replaced here by "tree" ?)

This section has been redrafted to clarify this point in the 12
Nov spec.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE/sksyOyltUcwYWjsRAuF9AKCXUhPeN8QOYPslbep3ovzW6zJ95gCfY4hG
UmTGwwMACXOpaeRSumM4JIQ=
=3lzv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 20:19:28 UTC