- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 16:56:42 -0400
- To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ Svgdeveloper@aol.com was heard to say:
| In 3.4 it is stated that dm:type, in the absence of type information, returns 
| xs:anyType or xs:anySimpleType. However in 4.1.7 it states that the type 
| returned in such a circumstance will be unique and implementation-defined.
|
| On the face of it the statements are inconsistent.
The distinction is between items that do not have a type (they were
skip validated or come from a well formed, non-validated document, for
example) and those that have a type that is declared locally in the
schema.
The former return anyType/anySimpleType. The latter return an
anonymous type name.
Does that distinction help? (I will naturally attempt to clarify the text as well.)
                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm
- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | Life does not cease to be funny when people
XML Standards Architect | die anymore than it ceases to be serious when
Web Tech. and Standards | people laugh.--George Bernard Shaw
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE+yUUKOyltUcwYWjsRAskQAKCyaH0a7QpKYBdOTDZjqeXsh43BaACgnwQx
gsMZTuVedeA8NVNPqTeEiMU=
=ZRcc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 19 May 2003 16:57:40 UTC