- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 16:56:42 -0400
- To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / Svgdeveloper@aol.com was heard to say: | In 3.4 it is stated that dm:type, in the absence of type information, returns | xs:anyType or xs:anySimpleType. However in 4.1.7 it states that the type | returned in such a circumstance will be unique and implementation-defined. | | On the face of it the statements are inconsistent. The distinction is between items that do not have a type (they were skip validated or come from a well formed, non-validated document, for example) and those that have a type that is declared locally in the schema. The former return anyType/anySimpleType. The latter return an anonymous type name. Does that distinction help? (I will naturally attempt to clarify the text as well.) Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Life does not cease to be funny when people XML Standards Architect | die anymore than it ceases to be serious when Web Tech. and Standards | people laugh.--George Bernard Shaw Sun Microsystems, Inc. | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+yUUKOyltUcwYWjsRAskQAKCyaH0a7QpKYBdOTDZjqeXsh43BaACgnwQx gsMZTuVedeA8NVNPqTeEiMU= =ZRcc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 19 May 2003 16:57:40 UTC