RE: Multiple result-documents, client-side transformations, and U RIs

MK
> Anything that improves the interoperability of URIs will of 
> course be very
> welcome to XSLT users, but the XSL WG is not the owner of 
> this particular
> problem.

Perhaps then the WG could / should? escalate this to TAG (Norm?)
as another area affected by the rfc?

I've updated the test page to include 4suite now.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/rfc2396/ 

I'm missing the Unix anomolies... if there are any :-)
regards DaveP


** snip here ***

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk

Received on Monday, 19 May 2003 05:43:24 UTC