- From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 08:17:10 -0700
- To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
How very odd. This message didn't go through the first time, although a
brief followup did. Let's try again, shall we ...
Howard
-----Original Message-----
From: Howard Katz [mailto:howardk@fatdog.com]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 4:15 PM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: different AST's
Why are the AST's emitted by the online grammar checkers at the XML Query
website different from those produced by walking the formal BNF's manually?
The former omit a lot of the intermediate productions. How come? For example
using the XPath 2.0 grammar checker at
http://www.w3.org/2003/05/applets/xpathApplet.html, if I enter
1
the parser widget emits:
|XPath2
| XPath
| Expr
| ExprSingle
| InstanceofExpr
| TreatExpr
| CastableExpr
| CastExpr
| UnaryExpr
| PathExpr
| StepExpr
| FilterStep
| IntegerLiteral 1
| Predicates <- why is this
here ??
Parsing the same expression using the XPath 2.0 EBNF (2may03) however should
produce the following:
XPath
Expr
ExprSingle
OrExpr <- so what happened to this?
andExpr <- and this?
instanceOfExpr
treatExpr
castableExpr
castExpr
comparisonExpr <- and this
rangeExpr <- and this
additiveExpr <- and
this
multiplicativeExpr <-
and this
unaryExpr
<- and this
unionExpr
intersectExceptExpr <- and this
valueExpr <- and this
pathExpr
relativePathExpr <- and this
stepExpr
filterStep
primaryExpr <- and this
literalExpr <- and this
numericExpr <- and this
integerExpr
As well, I get 404's on the two links to the BNF's.
Best,
Howard
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2003 11:18:16 UTC