- From: B. Smedberg <bsmedberg@covad.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:50:21 -0400
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Kay, Michael wrote: > discussions of these XSLT facilities, but the exact way that multiple result > trees might be handled in the browser is not something that the WG considers > within its scope - it's a product issue. I can only speculate about how > browsers might choose to map the abstract concepts in the specification to After further reading, I now understand that the href specified in result-document is relative to an implementation-defined URI. And that the nature of this URI is outside the scope of the XSLT spec. However, I still feel that a standardized protocol for (absolute URI) linking to result-documents would be a significant aid, even if these links were transformed internally by browser implementations to other formats. Is there a WG to consider the xslt: URI scheme as a separate spec? --BDS
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 10:50:29 UTC