RE: F&O idref function

I do not think so. If you have no type annotation, you will get nothing.

Best regards
Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk [mailto:David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk]
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 0:53 AM
> To: Ashok Malhotra; public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: F&O idref function
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashokma@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: 10 May 2003 21:15
> > To: Priscilla Walmsley; public-qt-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: F&O idref function
> >
> >
> >
> > The argument to fn:idref is a sequence of string (not a list of
> > strings).  Each string in the sequence is parsed as if it was
> > lexically
> > of type xs:ID.
> 
> What if the source document is well formed only?
> 
> Is the implication that any attribute of name idref is of type IDREF
> in the associated Schema?
>  If so, have you informed the XML WG of this change in semantics?
> 
> regards DaveP
> 
> *** snip here ***
> 
> -
> 
> NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
> intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use,
> disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
> immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your
> system.
> 
> RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any
> attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it
> cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are
> transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
> 
> Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email
> and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of RNIB.
> 
> RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
> 
> Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk

Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 00:40:49 UTC