- From: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:16:59 EDT
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 10:17:08 UTC
Section 21.1 is worded in a way which is potentially confusing. The section starts off with a statement that conformity is required *except* where explicitly stated later. However, some later points are expressed as requirements. Given the wording of the first sentence of the section those later requirements could be taken as things which a basic XSLT processor need NOT do. I assume that the intended meaning is the opposite of that. In an ideal world it might be clearer to list the requirements of a Basic processor and then express the requirements for a schema-aware processor as additional requirements. If the specifications had been layered differently that might have been easier to express than with the present specification design. In any case, it seems to me that Section 21.1 could be worded more clearly. Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 10:17:08 UTC