- From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 12:16:22 +0100
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
quote. The location and format of the trace data set are ·implementation defined·. unquote. So we may have this 'debug' information a) Added to the serialised output. b) Output to an error file c) Output to a terminal screen. And any one could be selected by an XSLT implementation? Which screws portability nicely? For XSLT I'd request the output 'location' (If I understand that term correctly) be defined. I.e. to follow the content of xsl:message. Regards DaveP. AC RNIB **** snip here ***** - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 07:16:49 UTC