- From: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 14:59:20 EDT
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
The name of the fn:get-local-name-from-QName function echoes the possibility for confusion that the XPath 1.0 local-name() function introduced. There is no such thing as a "local name", as far as I am aware. It seems to me that it would be better to name the function in 10.2.2 get-local-part-from-QName() function, since that is what it does. I guess we may not get rid of the local-name() function as a historical relic but I think introducing more confusion in naming functions should be avoided. Andrew Watt
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2003 14:59:32 UTC