RE: Threading of responses to comments

> Unless I hear to the contrary I will continue using the 
> document names in comments, since it seems to me to help the
> various editors pick out comments on documents for which they
> are directly responsible.

Yes, Yes please continue to do this - it is very useful.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

 
-----Original Message-----
From: Svgdeveloper@aol.com [mailto:Svgdeveloper@aol.com] 
Sent: May 9, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Paul Cotton
Cc: Ashok Malhotra; public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: Re: Threading of responses to comments

In a message dated 09/05/2003 17:31:09 GMT Daylight Time, pcotton@microsoft.com writes:



For some reason Outlook removes the leading "F&O:" from the subject
field when we use it to Reply to messages (I tested this). Maybe it does
it since it does this for "FW:" and "RE:" so you don't get messages with
"RE: RE: RE:" at the beginning of the subject field.  

Andrew:  Maybe it would be better if you put the document reference in
square brackets e.g "[F&O]" in your subject fields to avoid this
problem.


Hi Paul,

I think there are a few more comments already in the pipeline with a : in it. I will switch to using square brackets and hope that Outlook will be happier with that. :)

Unless I hear to the contrary I will continue using the document names in comments, since it seems to me to help the various editors pick out comments on documents for which they are directly responsible.

Regards

Andrew Watt

Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 13:11:20 UTC