- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 10:04:14 -0400
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Section 4.3.3. of the Data Model draft states:
If the [validity] property exists and is "valid" and the
[attributes] property contains an attribute with the local-name "nil"
and the namespace URI "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance",
then "true", otherwise "false".
I do not see why validity should be required for an element to be
nil. The mere presence of the xsi:nil="true" attribute should be
sufficient. Or just maybe it should also be required that the element
be empty. However, there's no reason it needs to be valid. I have
profitably used xsi:nil in documents without any schema or DTD.
I suggest deleting the phrase "the [validity] property exists and is
"valid" and "
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo@metalab.unc.edu
Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA
Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 10:05:35 UTC