- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 10:04:14 -0400
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Section 4.3.3. of the Data Model draft states: If the [validity] property exists and is "valid" and the [attributes] property contains an attribute with the local-name "nil" and the namespace URI "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance", then "true", otherwise "false". I do not see why validity should be required for an element to be nil. The mere presence of the xsi:nil="true" attribute should be sufficient. Or just maybe it should also be required that the element be empty. However, there's no reason it needs to be valid. I have profitably used xsi:nil in documents without any schema or DTD. I suggest deleting the phrase "the [validity] property exists and is "valid" and " -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA
Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 10:05:35 UTC