- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 16:57:17 -0700
- To: "Stephen Buxton" <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A05B468F9@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
While I agree that the data model needs to change here, I don't think your wording is correct. Typed values have to always be a (potential sequence of) atomic type(s). Thus the type value of a node whose type is unknown should be xdt:untypedAtomic (mapped from the PSVI type annotation called xs:anySimpleType). Xs:anySimpleType should not be used as an instance type (it is a general type of all atomic types and sequences and choices thereof), xs:anyType is the most general type of a node and not a value type. Best regards Michael ________________________________ From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Buxton Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 16:51 PM To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: ORA-DM-TYPE-CONSISTENCY Data Model, Section 5 says: "The typed value of nodes whose type is unknown (for instance because they have not been validated) are labeled with the type xs:anySimpleType." This should say "... labeled with the type xs:anySimpleType or xs:anyType" to be consistent with Data Model, Section 3.4 6th paragraph [cf http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jun/0235.html ]
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 19:57:27 UTC