- From: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 16:56:48 -0700
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3EF8E540.60703@oracle.com>
The term "fragment" is used inconsistently throughout the Data Model specification, appearing sometimes in the phrases "document fragment" and "data model fragment". The authoritative definition appears to be in section 4 "Nodes", second para: "A tree whose root node is some other kind of node [ie, not a document node] is referred to as a fragment". In view of this definition, the term "document fragment" appears to be an oxymoron. The phrase "data model fragment" appears to be used to mean something more general than this definition of "fragment". For example, Appendix A, "XML Information Set Conformance" first para: "The following information items must be exposed by the infoset producer to construct a data model fragment:...". In point of fact, the listed information items are equally necessary to support documents and not just fragments (note the definition says that fragments and documents are mutually exclusive, not that fragments are a superset including documents). [Note: cf http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003May/0032.html]
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 19:57:02 UTC