- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:56:29 -0700
- To: <dnovatchev@yahoo.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for you comment. I think the wording, below, is correct and does not need to be changed. If either node has attributes, and if either node has an attribute that is not deep-equal to an attribute of the other node, using the selected collation, then the result is false. All the best, Ashok > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dimitre Novatchev > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:14 AM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: DN-FO-14: 15.2.1 fn:deep-equal > > > DN-FO-14: 15.2.1 fn:deep-equal > > The definition of this function is wrong: > > "If either node has attributes, and if either node has an attribute that > is > not deep-equal to an attribute of the other node, using the selected > collation, then the result is false." > > According to this definition any two elements with two attributes each ar > not deep-equal. > > > Suggested solution: > Replace the above excerpt with: > > "If either node has attributes, and if either node has an attribute > that is not deep-equal to any attribute of the other node, using > the selected collation, then the result is false." > > Dimitre Novatchev. >
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 17:56:43 UTC