RE: DN-FO-14: 15.2.1 fn:deep-equal

> Thank you for you comment.  I think the wording, below, is correct and
> does not need to be changed.
>
> If either node has attributes, and if either node has an attribute that
> is not deep-equal to an attribute of the other node, using the selected
> collation, then the result is false.

Let's  have:

     <x a="1" b="2"/>

and

     <x a="1" b="2"/>

The attribute "a" from the first node is not equal to the attribute "b" from
the second.

According to the above definition:

"If either node has attributes,"  -- true
"and if either node has an attribute that is not deep-equal to an attribute
of the other node," -- true @a from the first node is not deep equal to @b
from the second node.

"using the selected collation, then the result is false."

So we conclude that the two nodes above are not deep-equal.


Good luck,

Dimitre Novatchev.


>
>
> All the best, Ashok
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dimitre Novatchev
> > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:14 AM
> > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: DN-FO-14: 15.2.1 fn:deep-equal
> >
> >
> > DN-FO-14: 15.2.1 fn:deep-equal
> >
> > The definition of this function is wrong:
> >
> > "If either node has attributes, and if either node has an attribute that
> > is
> > not deep-equal to an attribute of the other node, using the selected
> > collation, then the result is false."
> >
> > According to this definition any two elements with two attributes each
> ar
> > not deep-equal.
> >