- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:53:52 +0200
- To: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- CC: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Hi Ashok, hi F&O taskforce > Thank you for you comments on the F&O documents on May 2, 2003. Thank you very much for your reply, and for having discussed the issue. (more below) I really appreciate the fact that XSLT and related WGs are quite communicative. > The > F&O taskforce discussed your comments on the 5/29 telcon and concluded > that there was insufficient motivation for adding another function to > test for value equality of nodes in addition to vendee-equal. Which function are you referring to with "vendee-equal"? > We > agree that other definitions for value equality of nodes are possible > but there is not another single definition which obviously needs to be > added to the document. Also, users can write functions for the flavor > of node equality they desire. I guess you mean that there will be no fn:node-equal()? > Please let us know whether you agree with this response. I can live with it :) I hope that an initiative like EXSLT will design and specify a comprehensive library of useful functions for XSLT 2, which can be implemented natively by XSLT processors (not written in XSLT, but in the language the processor is written in, eg C++ or Java). Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 09:54:24 UTC