- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:33:33 +0100
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Could XSLT provide a no-namespace synonym such as "sequence" for the > most general type, so that if you want a sequence rather than a tree you > go as="sequence" ? Forget that, I think item()* is available for that use. Hoever at the beginning of 9.1 it says If the as attribute is omitted, the supplied value of the variable is used directly, and no conversion takes place. The effect is the same as if the type were specified as item()*. which is misleading as it implies that omitting as= is the same as specifying as="item()*" which isn't true for xsl:variable, as explained in 9.3. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 09:34:02 UTC