W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2003

RE: MS-FO-LC1-016: Handling of () with operators

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:46:22 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB09D18ACA@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Michael:

Thank you for your comment.  I have looked at the op: functions in
section 6.2 and elsewhere and the semantics do not describe

behavior if the functions are passed ().  I will double check.

All the best, Ashok 

________________________________

From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Rys
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 3:54 PM To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: MS-FO-LC1-016: Handling of () with operators

 

Class: Editorial      
 
section 6.2 and others: The operator function signatures do not allow
(), however the actual operators accept (). This mismatch leads to
confusion and should be solved by either adding the semantics for () or
by some other form of consolidation.
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2003 08:46:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:48 UTC