- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:46:22 -0700
- To: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2003 08:46:30 UTC
Michael: Thank you for your comment. I have looked at the op: functions in section 6.2 and elsewhere and the semantics do not describe behavior if the functions are passed (). I will double check. All the best, Ashok ________________________________ From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Rys Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 3:54 PM To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: MS-FO-LC1-016: Handling of () with operators Class: Editorial section 6.2 and others: The operator function signatures do not allow (), however the actual operators accept (). This mismatch leads to confusion and should be solved by either adding the semantics for () or by some other form of consolidation.
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2003 08:46:30 UTC