- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:27:22 -0700
- To: "Biron,Paul V" <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB09D1840B@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Thank, Paul! Fixed.
All the best, Ashok
________________________________
From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Biron,Paul V
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:50 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: typo and minor comment on fn:resolve-uri
The 4th paragraph of 11.1 fn:resolve-uri says [1]:
If the $relativeURI is the zero-length string,
returns the value of the base-uri property from
the static context in the first form and $base in
the second form.
The typo is "$relativeURI" should be "$relative".
The minor comment is that this paragraph should say what happens in the
1st case when the base-uri property is not initialized in the static
context (like the paragraph above does), i.e., something like:
If the $relative is the zero-length string,
in the first form returns the value of the base-uri
property from the static context if it is defined
(if the base-uri property is not initialized in the
static context an error is raised), in the second form
returns $base.
pvb
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 13:28:01 UTC