- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:34:20 -0700
- To: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com> was heard to say: | *Data Model, **Section 1, Introduction. *The distinction between data | model and value in the second paragraph is good, but I think a third | concept should also be introduced and given a name. This third concept | is the set of all values currently under consideration during the | execution of some processor (XSLT, XQuery, etc.) using the data model. | A possible name for this concept is "data set". Thus the three | concepts are: | | "data model" - the abstract framework specified by this specification | "data set" - a concrete realization of the data model at a particular | point in the execution of a processor | "value" - a value in a data set. I'm not sure I understand your comment. Are you suggesting that the term "data set" should be defined for a concrete instance of a data model? Where would this term be referenced? (I don't see any value in defining the term if it isn't referenced.) Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Simplicity is always a virtue.--Edward Abbey XML Standards Architect | Web Tech. and Standards | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE/FC0LOyltUcwYWjsRAgBDAKCtRRBUH2DRbk/z2yR8zBrEqIDFjgCcD3Uu j3NNnhV4R2G+PJTp0lMDt38= =c0f3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2003 16:13:07 UTC